Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Teacher Candidate’s Opinions on Presentation Programs

Year 2018, Volume: 26 Issue: 6, 1875 - 1885, 15.11.2018
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2207

Abstract

The opinions of teacher candidates on
presentation programs was examined in this study. The research was carried out
with the participation of 225 teacher candidates who were studying in the 1st
and 2nd grade in spring semester of 2016-2017 academic year. Descriptive method
is used in study. At the first phase of the research, the participants were
trained by the researchers for the Microsoft PowerPoint, Prezi and PowToon
presentation programs and then they created educational materials with these
programs. At the second phase of the research, data were collected by applying a
questionnaire to the participants to get opinions on presentation programs. Questions
about candidate teachers' opinions on presentation programs, the future use of
these programs and the problems they encountered during implementation were
included in the questionnaire. According to the findings obtained, it is
determined that more than half of the teacher candidates have a positive
attitude towards the presentation programs.

References

  • Altun, E. (2009) Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümleri İçin Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri. Pegem Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Atkins-Sayre, W., Hopkins, S., Mohundro, S., & Sayre, W. (1998). Rewards and Liabilities of Presentation Software as an Ancillary Tool: Prison or Paradise?. Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, New York.
  • Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L. ve Scepansky J. A. (2006). The Impact of Presentation Graphics on Students’ Experience in the Classroom. Computers & Education, 47(1), 116-126.
  • Aşkar, P. (1999). Eğitimde Teknoloji Kullanımı. Eğitimde Yansımalar V. 21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde Türk Eğitim Sistemi Ulusal Sempozyumu’nda sunulmuş bildiri. Tekışık Eğitim Araştırma Geliştirme Vakfı, Ankara.
  • Conboy, C., Fletcher, S., Russell, K., & Wilson, M. (2012). An Evaluation of the Potential Use and Impact of Prezi, the Zooming Editor Software, as a Tool to Facilitate Learning in Higher Education.Innovations in Practice, 7, 38-45.
  • Duffy, R. M., Guerandel, A., Casey, P., Malone, K., & Kelly, B. D. (2015). Experiences of using Prezi in psychiatry teaching. Academic Psychiatry, 39(6), 615-619.
  • Forbes, C. (2014). Free Web-based tools for information literacy instruction. Library Hi Tech News, 31(10), 1-5.
  • ISTE Standarts (2017). National Educational Technology Standarts. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators. (2018 Ocak 17) Kiss, G. (2016). MS Power Point vs Prezi in Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,15(3), 126-130.
  • Lam, A. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of Prezi in higher education. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 45(2), 174.
  • Moulton, S. T., Türkay, S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2017). Does a presentation’s medium affect its message? PowerPoint, Prezi, and oral presentations. PloS one, 12(7).
  • Microsoft (2017). PowerPoint Nedir? <https://support.office.com/tr-tr/article/PowerPoint-2010-daki-temel-g%C3%B6revler-35308dfb-792d-400a-b69a-1188b019c66a #bm2> (2017, Haziran 6).
  • PC, (2017). The Best Presentation Software of 2017. <http://www.pcmag.com/roundup/351652/the-best-presentation-software> (2017 Temmuz 18)
  • Perron B. E. & Stearns, A. G. (2010). A Review of a Presentation Technology: Prezi. Research on Social Work Practice, 1-2.
  • Santiana, S., & Fatimah, A. S. (2017). Prezı, Cloud-Based Presentatıon, For Teachıng: How Is It Interestıng?. Edulite, 2(2), 445-456.
  • Strasser, N. (2014). Using Prezi in higher education. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (Online), 11(2), 95.
  • Špernjak, A. (2014) Is Prezi More Usefullness Education Tool Than PowerPoint? International Conferecnce on Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology sunulmuş bildiri. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Konya.
  • Susskind, J. E. (2005). PowerPoint’s Power in the Classroom: Enhacing Students’ Self Efficacy and Attitudes. Computers & Education, 45(2), 203-215.
  • Szabo, A. & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in The Undergraduate Classroom: Should We Replace The Blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers and Education, 35(2000), 175–187
  • Tufte, E. (2006). The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. <https://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/teaching/courses/pi/2016_2017/phil/tufte-powerpoint.pdf> (2017 Temmuz 20)
  • Uz, C., Orhan, F. ve Bilgiç, G. (2010). Prospective teachers´ opinions on the value of PowerPoint presentations in lecturing. Procedia Social Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2051-2059.
  • White, N. L. (2011). Prezi v. PowerPoint: Finding the right tool for the job. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, State University of Technology Utica, NY.
  • Yıldırım A. ve Şimşek, H. (2006). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara.

Öğretmen Adaylarının Sunum Programlarına Yönelik Görüşleri

Year 2018, Volume: 26 Issue: 6, 1875 - 1885, 15.11.2018
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2207

Abstract

Bu çalışma ile öğretmen adaylarının sunum
programlarına yönelik görüşleri incelenmiştir. Araştırma 2016-2017
eğitim-öğretim yılı bahar döneminde 1. ve 2. sınıfta öğrenim gören 225 öğretmen
adayının katılımı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada betimsel yöntem kullanılmıştır.
Uygulamanın ilk aşamasında katılımcılar, araştırmacılar tarafından gösterilen Microsoft
PowerPoint, Prezi ve PowToon sunum programlarına yönelik eğitim almış ve bu
programları kullanarak eğitsel içerikli materyaller oluşturmuşlardır.
Araştırmanın ikinci aşamasında ise katılımcılara sunum programlarına yönelik anket
uygulanarak veri toplanmıştır.
Ankette öğretmen
adaylarının sunum programlarına yönelik görüşlerinin yanı sıra bu programları
gelecekte kullanma durumları ve uygulama sırasında karşılaştıkları sorunlara
yönelik sorulara yer verilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre öğretmen adaylarının
yarıdan çoğunun sunum programlarına olumlu bir tutum içerisinde olduğu
belirlenmiştir.

References

  • Altun, E. (2009) Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümleri İçin Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri. Pegem Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Atkins-Sayre, W., Hopkins, S., Mohundro, S., & Sayre, W. (1998). Rewards and Liabilities of Presentation Software as an Ancillary Tool: Prison or Paradise?. Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, New York.
  • Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L. ve Scepansky J. A. (2006). The Impact of Presentation Graphics on Students’ Experience in the Classroom. Computers & Education, 47(1), 116-126.
  • Aşkar, P. (1999). Eğitimde Teknoloji Kullanımı. Eğitimde Yansımalar V. 21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde Türk Eğitim Sistemi Ulusal Sempozyumu’nda sunulmuş bildiri. Tekışık Eğitim Araştırma Geliştirme Vakfı, Ankara.
  • Conboy, C., Fletcher, S., Russell, K., & Wilson, M. (2012). An Evaluation of the Potential Use and Impact of Prezi, the Zooming Editor Software, as a Tool to Facilitate Learning in Higher Education.Innovations in Practice, 7, 38-45.
  • Duffy, R. M., Guerandel, A., Casey, P., Malone, K., & Kelly, B. D. (2015). Experiences of using Prezi in psychiatry teaching. Academic Psychiatry, 39(6), 615-619.
  • Forbes, C. (2014). Free Web-based tools for information literacy instruction. Library Hi Tech News, 31(10), 1-5.
  • ISTE Standarts (2017). National Educational Technology Standarts. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators. (2018 Ocak 17) Kiss, G. (2016). MS Power Point vs Prezi in Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,15(3), 126-130.
  • Lam, A. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of Prezi in higher education. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 45(2), 174.
  • Moulton, S. T., Türkay, S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2017). Does a presentation’s medium affect its message? PowerPoint, Prezi, and oral presentations. PloS one, 12(7).
  • Microsoft (2017). PowerPoint Nedir? <https://support.office.com/tr-tr/article/PowerPoint-2010-daki-temel-g%C3%B6revler-35308dfb-792d-400a-b69a-1188b019c66a #bm2> (2017, Haziran 6).
  • PC, (2017). The Best Presentation Software of 2017. <http://www.pcmag.com/roundup/351652/the-best-presentation-software> (2017 Temmuz 18)
  • Perron B. E. & Stearns, A. G. (2010). A Review of a Presentation Technology: Prezi. Research on Social Work Practice, 1-2.
  • Santiana, S., & Fatimah, A. S. (2017). Prezı, Cloud-Based Presentatıon, For Teachıng: How Is It Interestıng?. Edulite, 2(2), 445-456.
  • Strasser, N. (2014). Using Prezi in higher education. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (Online), 11(2), 95.
  • Špernjak, A. (2014) Is Prezi More Usefullness Education Tool Than PowerPoint? International Conferecnce on Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology sunulmuş bildiri. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Konya.
  • Susskind, J. E. (2005). PowerPoint’s Power in the Classroom: Enhacing Students’ Self Efficacy and Attitudes. Computers & Education, 45(2), 203-215.
  • Szabo, A. & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in The Undergraduate Classroom: Should We Replace The Blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers and Education, 35(2000), 175–187
  • Tufte, E. (2006). The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. <https://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/teaching/courses/pi/2016_2017/phil/tufte-powerpoint.pdf> (2017 Temmuz 20)
  • Uz, C., Orhan, F. ve Bilgiç, G. (2010). Prospective teachers´ opinions on the value of PowerPoint presentations in lecturing. Procedia Social Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2051-2059.
  • White, N. L. (2011). Prezi v. PowerPoint: Finding the right tool for the job. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, State University of Technology Utica, NY.
  • Yıldırım A. ve Şimşek, H. (2006). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Pınar Mıhcı Türker

Ferhat Kadir Pala

Publication Date November 15, 2018
Acceptance Date February 19, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 26 Issue: 6

Cite

APA Mıhcı Türker, P., & Pala, F. K. (2018). Öğretmen Adaylarının Sunum Programlarına Yönelik Görüşleri. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(6), 1875-1885. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2207

10037