BibTex RIS Cite

A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection

Year 2016, Volume: 33 Issue: 4, 0 - 0, 03.07.2017

Abstract

Self mutilation poses a stigmatizing concern for a repentant patient and yield to social eschewing. Many of them undergo surgery for treatment of such scars. In this report, we present a case in whom we elected a self mutilation scar bearing dorsal surface of the forearm as a flap donor site for resurfacing a defect on the back of the first web space. Patient had been referred hand injury by shotgun.  While that particular flap (posterior interosseous flap) is not our first choice in such cases, in the face of this preexisting condition we stepped out of our comfort zone for the sake of treating both conditions in one sitting. We think that if a patient with stigmatizing scars presents in need of surgical reconstruction, scarred sites should be chosen as donor sites whenever possible. Therefore, when the hand defects reconstructed, simultaneously, an acceptable single longitudinal scar can be leaved on the forearm instead unpleasant transvers scars.

Year 2016, Volume: 33 Issue: 4, 0 - 0, 03.07.2017

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Surgery Medical Sciences
Authors

İbrahim Alper Aksakal

Tekin Sımsek

Murat Sinan Engın

Ethem Guneren

Publication Date July 3, 2017
Submission Date April 1, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 33 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Aksakal, İ. A., Sımsek, T., Engın, M. S., Guneren, E. (2017). A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 33(4).
AMA Aksakal İA, Sımsek T, Engın MS, Guneren E. A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. J. Exp. Clin. Med. July 2017;33(4).
Chicago Aksakal, İbrahim Alper, Tekin Sımsek, Murat Sinan Engın, and Ethem Guneren. “A Social Stigma As a Favorable Reconstructive Option: Implications on Donor Site Selection”. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 33, no. 4 (July 2017).
EndNote Aksakal İA, Sımsek T, Engın MS, Guneren E (July 1, 2017) A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 33 4
IEEE İ. A. Aksakal, T. Sımsek, M. S. Engın, and E. Guneren, “A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 33, no. 4, 2017.
ISNAD Aksakal, İbrahim Alper et al. “A Social Stigma As a Favorable Reconstructive Option: Implications on Donor Site Selection”. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 33/4 (July 2017).
JAMA Aksakal İA, Sımsek T, Engın MS, Guneren E. A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2017;33.
MLA Aksakal, İbrahim Alper et al. “A Social Stigma As a Favorable Reconstructive Option: Implications on Donor Site Selection”. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, 2017.
Vancouver Aksakal İA, Sımsek T, Engın MS, Guneren E. A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2017;33(4).