Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 69 - 77, 15.01.2017

Serdar Koruk

https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.1.69

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • Banse, R. (2004). Adult attachment and marital satisfaction: Evidence for dyadic configuration effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 273-282.
  • Beach, S. R., & O'Leary, K. D. (1993). Marital discord and dysphoria: For whom does the marital relationship predict depressive symptomatology? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(3), 405-420.
  • Belsky, J. (1990). Parental and nonparental child care and children's socioemotional development: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(4), 885-903.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.
  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Volume 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.
  • Cheung, M. (2005). A cross-cultural comparison of gender factors contributing to long-term marital satisfaction: A narrative analysis. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 4(1), 51-78.
  • Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. (1994). Children and marital conflict: The impact of family dispute and resolution. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Dakin, J., & Wampler, R. (2008). Money doesn't buy happiness, but it helps: Marital satisfaction, psychological distress, and demographic differences between low-and middle-income clinic couples. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(4), 300-311.
  • Dogan, I. (2015). Evaluatig the validity and reliability of the structural equation modeling in different data structure and sample sizes (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Eskisehir Osmangazi Universitesi, Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu, Eskisehir, Turkiye.
  • Egeci, I. S., & Gencoz, T. (2006). Factors associated with relationship satisfaction: Importance of communication skills. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28(3), 383-391.
  • Erbek E, Bestepe E, Akar H. (2005). Marital adjustment. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 18(1), 39-47.
  • Fisiloglu, (2001). Consanguineous marriage and marital adjustment in Turkey. The Family Journal, 9(2), 215-222.
  • Gallo, L. C., & Smith, T. W. (2001). Attachment style in marriage: Adjustment and responses to interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(2), 263-289.
  • Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Marital conflict and children's adjustment: A cognitive-contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 267-290.
  • Hafner R. J., Spence N. S. (1988). Marriage duration, marital adjustment and psychological symptoms: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Psychol, 44(3), 309-316.
  • Huston, T. L., Surra, C. A., Fitzgerald, N. M., & Cate, R. M. (1981). From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process. Personal Relationships, 2, 53-88.
  • Jabalamelian, S. A. (2011). The relationship between marital quality and health related quality of life. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research In Business, 3(7), 51-59.
  • Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel arastirma yontemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
  • Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333-351.
  • Keskin, G., & Cam, O. (2008). Relationship between mental health, parental attitude and attachment style in adolescence. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 9(3), 139-147.
  • Kim, E. (2012). Marital adjustment and depressive symptoms in Korean Americans. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33(6), 370-376.
  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.).
  • New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Lauer, R. H., & Lauer, J. C. (1997). Marriage and family: The quest for intimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 203-223, 246-266.
  • Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179-208.
  • Ozmen, O., & Atik, G. (2010). Attachment styles and marital adjustment of Turkish married individuals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 367-371.
  • Scott, R. L., & Cordova, J. V. (2002). The influence of adult attachment styles on the association between marital adjustment and depressive symptoms. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(2), 199-208.
  • Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17- nation study. Journal of Marriage & The Family, 60 (2), 527-537.
  • Surra, C. A., & Longstreth, M. (1990). Similarity of outcomes, interdependence, and conflict in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 501-516.
  • Sahin, N. H., & Durak, A. (1994). A study of the Brief Symptom Inventory in Turkish Youth.. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 9(31), 44-56.
  • Sendil, G., & Kizildag, O. (2003). The perception of parental marital conflict in children and adolescents. Turkish Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 10(2), 58-66.
  • Sendil, G., & Korkut, Y. (2012). An investigation of the dyadic adjustment and marital conflict scores of married couples in terms of their demographical characteristics. Studies in Psychology, 28, 15-34.
  • Wayment, H. A., & Campbell, S. (2000). How are we doing? The impact of motives and information used on the evaluation of romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 31-52.
  • Whitton S. W, Whisman M. A. (2010). Relationship satisfaction instability and depression. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(6), 791-794.

The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 69 - 77, 15.01.2017

Serdar Koruk

https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.1.69

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the moderating effects of attachment styles and gender on the predictive strength of marital adjustment on psychological symptoms among Turkish married individuals. Correlational model was used and the sample consisted of 178 married individuals. The data was gathered through online survey. The Turkish form of Brief Symptom Inventory (BFI) was used to measure psychological symptoms. The Turkish form of Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) was used to measure marital adjustment and the Turkish form of Relationship Scales Questionnaire (RSQ) was used to measure attachment styles. The hypothetical model was formed and tested through path analysis technique of structural equational modeling. Results showed that secure, dismissing and fearful attachment styles and gender moderated the predictive strength of marital adjustment on psychological symptoms. It was found that the relationship between marital adjustment and psychological symptom is stronger among individuals who have secure attachment style

Anahtar Kelimeler

Attachment gender marital adjustment mental health

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • Banse, R. (2004). Adult attachment and marital satisfaction: Evidence for dyadic configuration effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 273-282.
  • Beach, S. R., & O'Leary, K. D. (1993). Marital discord and dysphoria: For whom does the marital relationship predict depressive symptomatology? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(3), 405-420.
  • Belsky, J. (1990). Parental and nonparental child care and children's socioemotional development: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(4), 885-903.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.
  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Volume 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.
  • Cheung, M. (2005). A cross-cultural comparison of gender factors contributing to long-term marital satisfaction: A narrative analysis. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 4(1), 51-78.
  • Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. (1994). Children and marital conflict: The impact of family dispute and resolution. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Dakin, J., & Wampler, R. (2008). Money doesn't buy happiness, but it helps: Marital satisfaction, psychological distress, and demographic differences between low-and middle-income clinic couples. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(4), 300-311.
  • Dogan, I. (2015). Evaluatig the validity and reliability of the structural equation modeling in different data structure and sample sizes (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Eskisehir Osmangazi Universitesi, Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu, Eskisehir, Turkiye.
  • Egeci, I. S., & Gencoz, T. (2006). Factors associated with relationship satisfaction: Importance of communication skills. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28(3), 383-391.
  • Erbek E, Bestepe E, Akar H. (2005). Marital adjustment. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 18(1), 39-47.
  • Fisiloglu, (2001). Consanguineous marriage and marital adjustment in Turkey. The Family Journal, 9(2), 215-222.
  • Gallo, L. C., & Smith, T. W. (2001). Attachment style in marriage: Adjustment and responses to interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(2), 263-289.
  • Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Marital conflict and children's adjustment: A cognitive-contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 267-290.
  • Hafner R. J., Spence N. S. (1988). Marriage duration, marital adjustment and psychological symptoms: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Psychol, 44(3), 309-316.
  • Huston, T. L., Surra, C. A., Fitzgerald, N. M., & Cate, R. M. (1981). From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process. Personal Relationships, 2, 53-88.
  • Jabalamelian, S. A. (2011). The relationship between marital quality and health related quality of life. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research In Business, 3(7), 51-59.
  • Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel arastirma yontemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
  • Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333-351.
  • Keskin, G., & Cam, O. (2008). Relationship between mental health, parental attitude and attachment style in adolescence. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 9(3), 139-147.
  • Kim, E. (2012). Marital adjustment and depressive symptoms in Korean Americans. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33(6), 370-376.
  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.).
  • New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Lauer, R. H., & Lauer, J. C. (1997). Marriage and family: The quest for intimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 203-223, 246-266.
  • Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179-208.
  • Ozmen, O., & Atik, G. (2010). Attachment styles and marital adjustment of Turkish married individuals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 367-371.
  • Scott, R. L., & Cordova, J. V. (2002). The influence of adult attachment styles on the association between marital adjustment and depressive symptoms. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(2), 199-208.
  • Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17- nation study. Journal of Marriage & The Family, 60 (2), 527-537.
  • Surra, C. A., & Longstreth, M. (1990). Similarity of outcomes, interdependence, and conflict in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 501-516.
  • Sahin, N. H., & Durak, A. (1994). A study of the Brief Symptom Inventory in Turkish Youth.. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 9(31), 44-56.
  • Sendil, G., & Kizildag, O. (2003). The perception of parental marital conflict in children and adolescents. Turkish Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 10(2), 58-66.
  • Sendil, G., & Korkut, Y. (2012). An investigation of the dyadic adjustment and marital conflict scores of married couples in terms of their demographical characteristics. Studies in Psychology, 28, 15-34.
  • Wayment, H. A., & Campbell, S. (2000). How are we doing? The impact of motives and information used on the evaluation of romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 31-52.
  • Whitton S. W, Whisman M. A. (2010). Relationship satisfaction instability and depression. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(6), 791-794.
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Diğer ID JA63PH24FS
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Serdar Koruk

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Ocak 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Koruk, S. (2017). The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.1.69
AMA Koruk S. The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms. eujer. Ocak 2017;6(1):69-77. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.6.1.69
Chicago Koruk, Serdar. “The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms”. European Journal of Educational Research 6, sy. 1 (Ocak 2017): 69-77. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.1.69.
EndNote Koruk S (01 Ocak 2017) The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms. European Journal of Educational Research 6 1 69–77.
IEEE S. Koruk, “The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms”, eujer, c. 6, sy. 1, ss. 69–77, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.6.1.69.
ISNAD Koruk, Serdar. “The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms”. European Journal of Educational Research 6/1 (Ocak 2017), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.1.69.
JAMA Koruk S. The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms. eujer. 2017;6:69–77.
MLA Koruk, Serdar. “The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms”. European Journal of Educational Research, c. 6, sy. 1, 2017, ss. 69-77, doi:10.12973/eu-jer.6.1.69.
Vancouver Koruk S. The Effect of Gender and Attachment Styles on the Relationship between Marital Adjustment and Psychological Symptoms. eujer. 2017;6(1):69-77.
 Kapak Resmi İndir