Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2021,
Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 20 - 29, 30.06.2021
Öz
The purpose of this study was to examine 7-9 years old students’ perceptions of robotic coding through drawings and their explanations. Phenomenological research design, one of the qualitative research methods and techniques, was used. Convenience sampling method was used in this study. A total of 14 students who took education about robotic coding education in a private school in a city center in the Marmara region participated in the study. “Draw and explain technique” was used in the collection of the data. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results of the study indicated that, students mostly drew robots in their drawings regarding the concept of robotic coding. In addition to drawing robots, they drew tablets, 3D-printers, cars, computers, headphone and Arduino set, respectively. Most of the students drew inanimate objects such as "robot" and "3D-printer" in their drawings, and only a few included living beings to their drawings. While it was seen that most of the students did not include themselves in their drawings, it was also noteworthy that they added living features such as human, face and hand to the robots or devices they drew. Moreover, it was observed that girls used colors more than boys in their drawings.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Robotic coding 3D-design draw and explain technique primary school
Kaynakça
- Atalay, N., Anagün, Ş. S., & Kumtepe. E. G. (2016). Evaluation of technology integration in science teaching with 21st century skills: A slowmation application. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(2), 405-424.
- Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661-670.
- Byrne, J., Grace, M., & Hanley, P. (2009). Children's anthropomorphic and anthropocentric ideas about micro-organisms: Educational research. Journal of Biological Education, 44(1), 37-43.
- Çağıltay, K., Çakıroğlu, J., Çağıltay, N., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2001). Teachers’ perspectives about the use of computers in education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 21(21), 19-28.
- Campbell, C., & Walsh, C. (2017). Introducing the 'new' digital literacy of coding in the early years. Practical Literacy: The Early and Primary Years, 22(3), 10-12.
- Chalmers, C. (2018). Robotics and computational thinking in primary school. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 17, 93-100.
- Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, 162-175.
- Eguchi, A. (2014, July). Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In Proceeding of 4th international workshop teaching robotics, teaching with robotics & 5th international conference robotics in education Padova (Italy) (pp. 27-34).
- Ersoy, A., & Türkkan, B. (2009). Perceptions about Internet in elementary school children’s drawings. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 57-73.
- García-Carrillo, C., Greca, I. M., & Fernández-Hawrylak, M. (2021). Teacher perspectives on teaching the stem approach to educational coding and robotics in primary education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 64.
- Hall, E. (2008, September). My brain printed it out! Drawing, communication, and young children: A discussion. In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh (pp. 3-6).
- Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175-192.
- Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Anthropomorphism and animism in early years science: Why teachers use them, how they conceptualise them and what are their views on their use. Research in Science Education, 34(3), 291-311.
- Kattmann, U. (2008). Learning biology by means of anthropomorphic conceptions? In M.Hammann, M. Reiss, C. Boulter, & S. D. Tunnicliffe (Eds.), Biology in context: Learning and teaching for the twenty-first century (pp. 7–17). London: Institute of Education.
- López, J. M. S., Otero, R. B., & García-Cervigón, S. D. L. (2021). Introducing robotics and block programming in elementary education. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 95-113.
- McWhirter, J. M., Collins, M., Bryant, I., Wetton, N. M., & Bishop, J. N. (2000). EvaluatingSafe in the Sun', a curriculum programme for primary schools. Health Education Research, 15(2), 203-217.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
- Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2019). Exploring children's learning experience in constructionism-based coding activities through design-based research. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 415-427.
- Sáez-López, J. M., Sevillano-García, M. L., & Vazquez-Cano, E. (2019). The effect of programming on primary school students’ mathematical and scientific understanding: Educational use of mBot. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1405-1425.
- Sayın, Z., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Coding education as a new 21st century skill and its effect on educational policies. In Academic Informatics Conference (pp. 3-5).
- Sullivan, F. R. (2008). Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373-394.
- Ulubey, Ö., & Aykaç, N. (2017). Reflections of educational philosophies on the primary school curricula from the foundation of the republic of Turkey to 2005. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(3), 1173-1202.
- White, R. T., & Gunstone. R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
- Yavuzer, H. (2000). Resimleriyle çocuk (8thEd.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
- Yavuzer, H. (2013). Resimleriyle çocuk (17thEd.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Yıl 2021,
Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 20 - 29, 30.06.2021
Öz
The purpose of this study was to examine 7-9 years old students’ perceptions of robotic coding through drawings and their explanations. Phenomenological research design, one of the qualitative research methods and techniques, was used. Convenience sampling method was used in this study. A total of 14 students who took education about robotic coding education in a private school in a city center in the Marmara region participated in the study. “Draw and explain technique” was used in the collection of the data. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results of the study indicated that, students mostly drew robots in their drawings regarding the concept of robotic coding. In addition to drawing robots, they drew tablets, 3D-printers, cars, computers, headphone and Arduino set, respectively. Most of the students drew inanimate objects such as "robot" and "3D-printer" in their drawings, and only a few included living beings to their drawings. While it was seen that most of the students did not include themselves in their drawings, it was also noteworthy that they added living features such as human, face and hand to the robots or devices they drew. Moreover, it was observed that girls used colors more than boys in their drawings.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Robotic coding 3D-design draw and explain technique primary school
Kaynakça
- Atalay, N., Anagün, Ş. S., & Kumtepe. E. G. (2016). Evaluation of technology integration in science teaching with 21st century skills: A slowmation application. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(2), 405-424.
- Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661-670.
- Byrne, J., Grace, M., & Hanley, P. (2009). Children's anthropomorphic and anthropocentric ideas about micro-organisms: Educational research. Journal of Biological Education, 44(1), 37-43.
- Çağıltay, K., Çakıroğlu, J., Çağıltay, N., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2001). Teachers’ perspectives about the use of computers in education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 21(21), 19-28.
- Campbell, C., & Walsh, C. (2017). Introducing the 'new' digital literacy of coding in the early years. Practical Literacy: The Early and Primary Years, 22(3), 10-12.
- Chalmers, C. (2018). Robotics and computational thinking in primary school. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 17, 93-100.
- Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, 162-175.
- Eguchi, A. (2014, July). Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In Proceeding of 4th international workshop teaching robotics, teaching with robotics & 5th international conference robotics in education Padova (Italy) (pp. 27-34).
- Ersoy, A., & Türkkan, B. (2009). Perceptions about Internet in elementary school children’s drawings. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 57-73.
- García-Carrillo, C., Greca, I. M., & Fernández-Hawrylak, M. (2021). Teacher perspectives on teaching the stem approach to educational coding and robotics in primary education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 64.
- Hall, E. (2008, September). My brain printed it out! Drawing, communication, and young children: A discussion. In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh (pp. 3-6).
- Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175-192.
- Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Anthropomorphism and animism in early years science: Why teachers use them, how they conceptualise them and what are their views on their use. Research in Science Education, 34(3), 291-311.
- Kattmann, U. (2008). Learning biology by means of anthropomorphic conceptions? In M.Hammann, M. Reiss, C. Boulter, & S. D. Tunnicliffe (Eds.), Biology in context: Learning and teaching for the twenty-first century (pp. 7–17). London: Institute of Education.
- López, J. M. S., Otero, R. B., & García-Cervigón, S. D. L. (2021). Introducing robotics and block programming in elementary education. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 95-113.
- McWhirter, J. M., Collins, M., Bryant, I., Wetton, N. M., & Bishop, J. N. (2000). EvaluatingSafe in the Sun', a curriculum programme for primary schools. Health Education Research, 15(2), 203-217.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
- Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2019). Exploring children's learning experience in constructionism-based coding activities through design-based research. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 415-427.
- Sáez-López, J. M., Sevillano-García, M. L., & Vazquez-Cano, E. (2019). The effect of programming on primary school students’ mathematical and scientific understanding: Educational use of mBot. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1405-1425.
- Sayın, Z., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Coding education as a new 21st century skill and its effect on educational policies. In Academic Informatics Conference (pp. 3-5).
- Sullivan, F. R. (2008). Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373-394.
- Ulubey, Ö., & Aykaç, N. (2017). Reflections of educational philosophies on the primary school curricula from the foundation of the republic of Turkey to 2005. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(3), 1173-1202.
- White, R. T., & Gunstone. R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
- Yavuzer, H. (2000). Resimleriyle çocuk (8thEd.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
- Yavuzer, H. (2013). Resimleriyle çocuk (17thEd.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Haziran 2021 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2021 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 |