Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=E15o4t7fXyPwYF5wjRmf3A1WEpcBkuHeThEgz0k2pdc&_path=id%3D292791%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Den%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
 
BibTex RIS Cite

A STUDY TO DEVELOP A SCALE OF EXPRESSING EMOTIONS ON FACEBOOK

Year 2016, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 41 - 57, 30.06.2016

Ertuğrul Uçar

Abstract

One of the social networking sites, Facebook
has more than 14 million users in Turkey, which places Turkey into third
position among all countries. As revealed by research, social networking sites
are environments used by people to express their emotions. The current study
aims to develop a scale to determine what types of emotions are expressed by
university students on Facebook. The study group of the present research
consists of 347 students from the Education Faculty of Aksaray University in
the city of Aksaray in the fall term of 2012. As a result of extreme value
analysis, 15 observations were excluded from the analysis and thus, analyses
were conducted on the data collected from the remaining 322 participants. In
the present study, in order to test the construct validity of the scale factor
analysis was run and KMO was found to be .78. principal components analysis
was conducted to determine the factors on the data. Exploratory and
confirmatary Factor Analysis revealed that the items are subsumed under three
factors being loving Facebook, feeling comfortable on Facebook with a pseudo
name and felling uncomfortable with the sharings on Facebook. In the
reliability analysis of the Scale of Expressing Emotions on Facebook, Cronbach
Alpha was found to be .82. This value shows that the scale is moderately
reliable.

Keywords

Facebook; emotion; university students

References

  • Alexa Internet Inc. (2011). Alexa top 500 global sites. http://www.alexa.com/topsites Accesed 03.02.2011
  • Altman, I. ve Taylor, D. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
  • Baumeister, R. F. ve Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong. Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
  • Benkler, Y. (2009). The wealth of Networks How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yale University, New Haven and London.
  • Bono, J. E., Boles, T.C., Judge, T. A. ve Lauver, K. J. (2002). The role of personality in task and realtionship conflict. Journal of Personality. 70 (3): 311-344.
  • Buhrmester, D., ve Prayer, K. (1995). Patterns and functions of self-disclosure during childhood and adolescence. In K. J. Rotenberg (ed.), Disclosure processes in children and adolescents (pp.10-56). Cambridge University Press.
  • Burke, R., Fuqua, D. (1987). Akt; Hollenbaugh, E. E. Ve Ferris, A. L. (2014). Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, socail cohesion, and motives. Computers in Human Behavior. 30(2014), 50-58.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. 6. Baskı. Ankara: PegemA Yayınevi.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, O., Şekercioğlu, G. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Uygulamaları: SPSS ve Lisrell Uygulamalar. Ankara. Pegem Yayınevi.
  • Caspi, A., Roberts, B.W. ve Shiner, R. C. (2005). Personality Development: Stability and Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1956). Personality and motivation theory based on structural measurement. In J. L. McCary (Ed.), Psychology of Personality (pp. 63-121). New York: Logos.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1956). Validation and intensification of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 205-214.
  • Costa, P. T. ve Mc Crae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarcical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality ınventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. 64 (1). 21-50.
  • Crocker, J. ve Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin. 130, 392-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392.
  • Davidson, R. ve Duberman, L. (1982). Friendship: Communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 8, 809-822.
  • Dindia, K. (2002). Self-disclosure research: Knowlwdge through meta-analysis. İnm Allen, R.W. Preiss. B.M. Gayle N. Burnell (eds). Interpersonal Communication Research: Advances through meta-analysis. P. 169-185. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., ve Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”. Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 12(4), 1143-1168.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York. Norton. Akt; Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., ve Calvert, S.L. (2009). Collega students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 30, 227-238. Doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.
  • Fering, D. ve Flipp, S. H. (1996). Messung des selbstwertgefühls: befunde zu reliabilitat, validitat und stabilitat der Rosenberg–Skala, Diagnostica, 42, 284-292.
  • Fujita, F., Diener, E., ve Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427-434.
  • Forest, A. L., ve Wood, J. V. (2012). When socail networking is not working: Individuals wiith low self-esteem recognize but do not repeat the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychology Science, 23, 295-302, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429709.
  • Fox, J. Ve Warber, K. M. (2013). Romantic Relationship Development in the Age of Facebook: An Exploratory Study of Emerging Adults' Perceptions, Motives, and Behaviors Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. January 2013, 16(1): 3-7. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0288.
  • Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A. Ve Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving ınterpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 24, 893-905.
  • Greenhow, C. (2009). Tapping the wealth of social Networks for Professional development, Learning & Leading With Technology, June/July 2009, ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education).
  • Hoolenbaugh, E. E. ve Ferris, A. L. (2013). Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motive. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50-58.
  • Hunt, D. Atkin, D. ve Krishnan, A. (2012). The influence of computer-mediated communication apprehension on motives for Facebook use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electric Media. 56, 187-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.678717.
  • Kalpidou, M., Costin, D. Ve Morris, J. (2001). The realitonship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and socail networking. 14, 183-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0061.
  • Knapp, M. L., Ellis, D. G., ve Williams, B. A. (1980). Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms. Communication Monographs, 47, 262-278.
  • Kring, A. M. Ve Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in Emotion: Expression, Experince, and Psysiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 74, no. 3, 686-703.
  • Lee, J. E. R., Moore, D. C., Park, E.A. ve Park, S. G. (2012). Who wants to be friendrich? Social compensatory friending on Facebook and the moderating role of public self-consciousness. Computers in Human Behavior, 28. 1036-1043. http://dx.doi.org/101016/j.chb.2012.01.006.
  • Lenhart, A. ve Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy & online social Networks: howteens manage their online identieties and personal information in the age of MySpace. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Ma, M. L. ve Leung, L. (2006). Unwillingness-to-communicate, perceptions of the internet and self-disclosure in ICQ. Telematics and Informatics, 23, 22-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2005.01.001.
  • Maio, G. R. ve Esses, U. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences ın the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, Vol. 69, Issues, 4, 583-614.
  • McCrae, R. R., Jang, K. L., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (2001). Sources of structure: Genetic,environmental, and artifactual influences on the covariation of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 511–535.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S. ve Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: what’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 5, 9-31.
  • Nadkarni, A. ve Hofmann, S.G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Indıvidual differences, 52 (3). 243-249.
  • Nolan-Hoeksema, S. ve Girgus, J.S. 81994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin. Vol 115, No 3, 424-443.
  • Papacharissi, Z. ve Mendelson, A. (2011). Toward a new (er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. In S. Papathanassopulos (Ed.), Media perspectives fort he 21st Century (pp. 212-230). NY: Routledge.
  • Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M. ve Shouten, A.P. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media and Society, 7(3), 383-402.
  • Pogue, (2009). “Pogues Posts, “Twittering Tips for Beginners”, http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/15. (erişim tarihi: 17.10.2009).
  • Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2006). An analysis of college-students’ self-disclosure behaviors on the Internet. College Student Journal, 40(2), 329-331.
  • Ryan, T. ve Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the big five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior. 27 (2011). 1658-1664.
  • Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., ve Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Menlo-Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
  • Ross, C., Orr, E.S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M.G., ve Orr, R.R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578-586.
  • Salovey, P., Detweiler, J.B., Steward, W.T., & Bedell, B.T. (2001). Affect and health-relevant cognition. In J. Forgas (Ed.), The handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 344-368). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Socialbakers,(2009). (erişim tarihi 2.7.2014).
  • http://www.socialbakers.com/Facebook-pages/brands/country/turkey/.
  • Sheldon, K. M., Abad, N. ve Hirsch, C. (2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100,766-775.
  • Special, W. P., ve Li-Barber, K. T. (2012). Self-disclosure and student satisfaction with Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 624-630. http:dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.008.
  • Stren, S. R. (2004). Expressions of identity online: prominent features and gender differences in adolescents’. World wide web home pages. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48 (2), 218-243.
  • Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., ve Sears, D. O. (2005). Sosyal Psikoloji Ders Kitabı, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Xue-Yun (2007). Social psychology attribution of “EGao” in üniversity, US-China Education Review, 4(3), 1548-1613.
  • Valkenburg, P. M., Schouten, A. P., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media & Society, 7(3) 383-402.
  • Wiley, C., & Sisson, M. (2006). Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The use of face book by students and employers. Paper presented at the Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education Special Topics Forum, Dayton, OH. www.checkFacebook.com 15 Eylül 2009.
  • Yurtkoru, E. S. (2009). Sosyal ağ kullanımını etkileyen unsurların istatistiksel modellemesi: Facebook üzerine bir uygulama, 10. Ekonomik ve İstatistik Sempozyumu, Atatürk Üniversitesi Palandöken, Erzurum.

FACEBOOK’TA DUYGULARI İFADE ETME ÖLÇEĞİ GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI

Year 2016, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 41 - 57, 30.06.2016

Ertuğrul Uçar

Abstract

Sosyal paylaşım sitelerinden biri olan Facebook’un,
Türkiye’deki 14 milyonun üzerinde kullanıcı sayısıyla ülke sıralamasında üçüncü
sırada yer aldığı bilinmektedir. Araştırmaların ortaya koyduğu gibi sosyal
paylaşım siteleri insanların duygularını açmak için kullandıkları bir ortamdır.
Bu araştırma üniversite öğrencilerinin Facebook’ta ne tür duygularını ifade
ettiklerini belirlemek amacı ile bir ölçek geliştirme çalışmasıdır. Araştırma
grubunu 2012 eğitim-öğretim yılı güz döneminde Aksaray İli, Aksaray
Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nde
öğrenim gören 347 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Uç değer analizleri sonucunda 15
gözlem analiz dışı bırakılmış, böylece geriye kalan toplam 322 katılımcıdan
elde edilen verilerle analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada ölçeğin yapı
geçerliğini sınamak için açımlayıcı faktör analizi yapılmış ve KMO .78 olarak
bulunmuştur. Veriler üzerinde faktörleri belirlemek için Temel Bileşenler
Analizi yapılmıştır. Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda Facebook’u
sevme, sahte adla Facebook’ta rahat olma ve Facebook’taki paylaşımlardan
rahatsızlık olarak üç faktörde maddeler toplanmıştır. Facebook’ta Duygularını
İfade Etme Ölçeği için yapılan güvenirlik analizinde ise Cronbach Alpha .82
olarak bulunmuştur. Cronbach alfa katsayısı ölçeğin güvenilir olduğunu
göstermektedir.

Keywords

Facebook; duygu; üniversite öğrencisi

References

  • Alexa Internet Inc. (2011). Alexa top 500 global sites. http://www.alexa.com/topsites Accesed 03.02.2011
  • Altman, I. ve Taylor, D. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
  • Baumeister, R. F. ve Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong. Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
  • Benkler, Y. (2009). The wealth of Networks How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yale University, New Haven and London.
  • Bono, J. E., Boles, T.C., Judge, T. A. ve Lauver, K. J. (2002). The role of personality in task and realtionship conflict. Journal of Personality. 70 (3): 311-344.
  • Buhrmester, D., ve Prayer, K. (1995). Patterns and functions of self-disclosure during childhood and adolescence. In K. J. Rotenberg (ed.), Disclosure processes in children and adolescents (pp.10-56). Cambridge University Press.
  • Burke, R., Fuqua, D. (1987). Akt; Hollenbaugh, E. E. Ve Ferris, A. L. (2014). Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, socail cohesion, and motives. Computers in Human Behavior. 30(2014), 50-58.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. 6. Baskı. Ankara: PegemA Yayınevi.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, O., Şekercioğlu, G. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Uygulamaları: SPSS ve Lisrell Uygulamalar. Ankara. Pegem Yayınevi.
  • Caspi, A., Roberts, B.W. ve Shiner, R. C. (2005). Personality Development: Stability and Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1956). Personality and motivation theory based on structural measurement. In J. L. McCary (Ed.), Psychology of Personality (pp. 63-121). New York: Logos.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1956). Validation and intensification of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 205-214.
  • Costa, P. T. ve Mc Crae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarcical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality ınventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. 64 (1). 21-50.
  • Crocker, J. ve Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin. 130, 392-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392.
  • Davidson, R. ve Duberman, L. (1982). Friendship: Communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 8, 809-822.
  • Dindia, K. (2002). Self-disclosure research: Knowlwdge through meta-analysis. İnm Allen, R.W. Preiss. B.M. Gayle N. Burnell (eds). Interpersonal Communication Research: Advances through meta-analysis. P. 169-185. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., ve Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”. Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 12(4), 1143-1168.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York. Norton. Akt; Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., ve Calvert, S.L. (2009). Collega students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 30, 227-238. Doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.
  • Fering, D. ve Flipp, S. H. (1996). Messung des selbstwertgefühls: befunde zu reliabilitat, validitat und stabilitat der Rosenberg–Skala, Diagnostica, 42, 284-292.
  • Fujita, F., Diener, E., ve Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427-434.
  • Forest, A. L., ve Wood, J. V. (2012). When socail networking is not working: Individuals wiith low self-esteem recognize but do not repeat the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychology Science, 23, 295-302, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429709.
  • Fox, J. Ve Warber, K. M. (2013). Romantic Relationship Development in the Age of Facebook: An Exploratory Study of Emerging Adults' Perceptions, Motives, and Behaviors Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. January 2013, 16(1): 3-7. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0288.
  • Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A. Ve Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving ınterpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 24, 893-905.
  • Greenhow, C. (2009). Tapping the wealth of social Networks for Professional development, Learning & Leading With Technology, June/July 2009, ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education).
  • Hoolenbaugh, E. E. ve Ferris, A. L. (2013). Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motive. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50-58.
  • Hunt, D. Atkin, D. ve Krishnan, A. (2012). The influence of computer-mediated communication apprehension on motives for Facebook use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electric Media. 56, 187-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.678717.
  • Kalpidou, M., Costin, D. Ve Morris, J. (2001). The realitonship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and socail networking. 14, 183-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0061.
  • Knapp, M. L., Ellis, D. G., ve Williams, B. A. (1980). Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms. Communication Monographs, 47, 262-278.
  • Kring, A. M. Ve Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in Emotion: Expression, Experince, and Psysiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 74, no. 3, 686-703.
  • Lee, J. E. R., Moore, D. C., Park, E.A. ve Park, S. G. (2012). Who wants to be friendrich? Social compensatory friending on Facebook and the moderating role of public self-consciousness. Computers in Human Behavior, 28. 1036-1043. http://dx.doi.org/101016/j.chb.2012.01.006.
  • Lenhart, A. ve Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy & online social Networks: howteens manage their online identieties and personal information in the age of MySpace. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Ma, M. L. ve Leung, L. (2006). Unwillingness-to-communicate, perceptions of the internet and self-disclosure in ICQ. Telematics and Informatics, 23, 22-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2005.01.001.
  • Maio, G. R. ve Esses, U. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences ın the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, Vol. 69, Issues, 4, 583-614.
  • McCrae, R. R., Jang, K. L., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (2001). Sources of structure: Genetic,environmental, and artifactual influences on the covariation of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 511–535.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S. ve Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: what’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 5, 9-31.
  • Nadkarni, A. ve Hofmann, S.G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Indıvidual differences, 52 (3). 243-249.
  • Nolan-Hoeksema, S. ve Girgus, J.S. 81994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin. Vol 115, No 3, 424-443.
  • Papacharissi, Z. ve Mendelson, A. (2011). Toward a new (er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. In S. Papathanassopulos (Ed.), Media perspectives fort he 21st Century (pp. 212-230). NY: Routledge.
  • Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M. ve Shouten, A.P. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media and Society, 7(3), 383-402.
  • Pogue, (2009). “Pogues Posts, “Twittering Tips for Beginners”, http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/15. (erişim tarihi: 17.10.2009).
  • Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2006). An analysis of college-students’ self-disclosure behaviors on the Internet. College Student Journal, 40(2), 329-331.
  • Ryan, T. ve Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the big five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior. 27 (2011). 1658-1664.
  • Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., ve Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Menlo-Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
  • Ross, C., Orr, E.S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M.G., ve Orr, R.R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578-586.
  • Salovey, P., Detweiler, J.B., Steward, W.T., & Bedell, B.T. (2001). Affect and health-relevant cognition. In J. Forgas (Ed.), The handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 344-368). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Socialbakers,(2009). (erişim tarihi 2.7.2014).
  • http://www.socialbakers.com/Facebook-pages/brands/country/turkey/.
  • Sheldon, K. M., Abad, N. ve Hirsch, C. (2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100,766-775.
  • Special, W. P., ve Li-Barber, K. T. (2012). Self-disclosure and student satisfaction with Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 624-630. http:dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.008.
  • Stren, S. R. (2004). Expressions of identity online: prominent features and gender differences in adolescents’. World wide web home pages. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48 (2), 218-243.
  • Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., ve Sears, D. O. (2005). Sosyal Psikoloji Ders Kitabı, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Xue-Yun (2007). Social psychology attribution of “EGao” in üniversity, US-China Education Review, 4(3), 1548-1613.
  • Valkenburg, P. M., Schouten, A. P., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media & Society, 7(3) 383-402.
  • Wiley, C., & Sisson, M. (2006). Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The use of face book by students and employers. Paper presented at the Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education Special Topics Forum, Dayton, OH. www.checkFacebook.com 15 Eylül 2009.
  • Yurtkoru, E. S. (2009). Sosyal ağ kullanımını etkileyen unsurların istatistiksel modellemesi: Facebook üzerine bir uygulama, 10. Ekonomik ve İstatistik Sempozyumu, Atatürk Üniversitesi Palandöken, Erzurum.
There are 55 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ertuğrul Uçar

Publication Date June 30, 2016
Submission Date March 11, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 1 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Uçar, E. (2016). FACEBOOK’TA DUYGULARI İFADE ETME ÖLÇEĞİ GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 41-57.
 Download Cover Image

Dear Colleagues,
We are very pleased to announce that the latest issue of IHEAD (Vol. 10- Iss. 1) has been released. We kindly want to express our speacial thanks to the editorial board members, reviewers, and authors for their invaluable contribution to this issue. Also, we are delighted to announce that the next issue (Vol. 10- Iss. 2) of the IHEAD will be available online in December, 2025. As of January, 2024, IHEAD has been accepting submissions in English along with Turkish. Handling your papers within the scope education for the next issue will be a great pleasure for us. Many thanks in advance for your contributions.
Editorial Board

Ihlara Journal of Educational Research (IHEAD) by Education Faculty of Aksaray University is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license,visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/  

by-nc-sa.svg

Ihlara Journal Educational Research (IHEAD) uses iThenticate, one the most trusted plagiarism checkers by the world’s top researchers, publishers, and scholars.

ithenticate-badge-rec-reverse.jpg

Ihlara Journal Educational Research (IHEAD) is an open-access journal.

Open-Access-logo.png