PROSPECTIVE MIDDLE SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ USE OF PARAMETERS IN EXPLAINING GEOMETRIC TRANSFORMATIONS
Abstract
National and international curriculum documents give emphasis to geometric transformations. In particular, parameters of geometric transformations play crucial role in defining geometric transformations. Thus, it needs to be explored to what extent prospective teachers use parameters in explaining geometric transformations. In this study, qualitative case study methodology was used and participants were sixteen prospective middle school mathematics teachers enrolled in a teacher education program in Turkey. To reveal prospective teachers’, use of parameters in explaining geometric transformations, a transformation geometry activity was designed and implemented. During the implementation of the activity, classroom observations were carried out. The classroom observations focused on participants’ small group discussions and whole class discussions regarding geometric transformation concepts. Moreover, implementation of the activity was audio-taped and video-taped. Participants’ use of parameters was revealed by using written materials and participants’ explanations during the whole class
discussions. The findings showed that none of the pairs provided totally correct explanations for geometric transformations. They had partial understanding about the parameters of rotation. Moreover, one of the pairs held incorrect ideas about identification of the angle of rotation.
Keywords
References
- Battista, M. T. (2001). Shape makers: A computer environment that engenders students’ construction of geometric ideas and reasoning. Computers in Schools, 17, 105-120.
- Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420-465). New York: McMillan Publishing Company.
- Edwards, L. D. (1997). Exploring the territory before proof: Students’ generalizations in a computer microworld for transformation geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2, 187-215.
- Farmer, D. W. (1996). Groups and symmetry: A guide to discovering mathematics. Providence: American Mathematical Society.
- Harper, S. (2003). Enhancing elementary pre-service teachers’ knowledge of geometric transformations through the use of dynamic geometry computer software. In C. Crawford, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2909-2916). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
- Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hollebrands, K. F. (2004). High school students’ intuitive understandings of geometric transformations. Mathematics Teacher, 97, 207-214.
- Leong Y. H., & Lim-Teo S. K. (2003). Effects of Geometer’s Sketchpad on spatial ability and achievement in transformation geometry among secondary two students in Singapore. The Mathematics Educator, 7(1), 32-48.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Studies on Education
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Seher Avcu
*
0000-0003-4938-7325
Türkiye
Publication Date
June 30, 2019
Submission Date
January 30, 2019
Acceptance Date
May 30, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 4 Number: 1

