Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=lBFsaBW3GVztbyPd99TveZdHq6mqe6XCv2nithzylzY&_path=id%3D437219%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Den%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Review
BibTex RIS Cite

TEKNOLOJİ OKURYAZARLIĞI: TARİHSEL BİR BETİMLEME

Year 2018, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 107 - 126, 29.12.2018

Fatih Aydın , Yavuz Silik

Abstract

İnsanoğlunun hem geçmişte
hem de günümüzde teknoloji ile çok meşgul olduğu tartışılmaz bir gerçektir. Özellikle günümüzün bilgi çağında, teknolojinin farklı alanlarla bütünleşmesi
ve insanı farklı bir dünyaya getiren dijital teknolojiler gibi yenilikler,
araştırmalar, tartışmalar ve değişimler yaratmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı da,
teknoloji okuryazarlığının nasıl ve ne şekilde ortaya çıktığını, bu konudaki
tanımlamaların ve değişimlerin neler olduğunu, standartlar ve bunlara bağlı
programlar çerçevesinde nelerin dikkate alındığını ve dünyadaki yansımalarını
ortaya koyarak tarihsel bir betimleme yapmaktır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma
yöntemi benimsenmiş ve bu çerçevede doküman analizi yapılmıştır. Bu tarihsel betimlemede
teknoloji okuryazarlığının 1920’li yıllara kadar dayandığı ve çeşitli etiketler
kullanılarak yıllar içerisinde farklı şekillerde tanımlandığı görülmektedir.
Özellikle eğitim bağlamında standartların oluşturulduğu ve kısa sürede eğitim
programları içerisine entegre olduğu açıkça anlaşılmaktadır. Sonuçta, Teknoloji
okuryazarlığına ilişkin sunulan tüm bu süreçte ve gelinen noktada, teknoloji
okuryazarlığına ilişkin anlayışın, teknolojinin gelişimine ve birçok unsurla (birey,
toplum, kültür, tarih vb.) olan etkileşimine bağlı olarak bir devinim ve
değişim içinde olduğu açıkça anlaşılmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, sürekli bir
güncelleme içerisinde olmamız ve uygun standartlar geliştirerek disiplinler
arası bir yaklaşımda bulunmamız gerekmektedir.




Keywords

Teknoloji okuryazarlığı Teknoloji okuryazarlığı üzerine standartlar Teknoloji okuryazarı bireylerin tanımlanması Tarihsel betimleme

References

  • Ames, O. (1994). A Program for Technological Literacy in the Liberal Arts. Journal of College Science Teaching, March/April, 286–288.
  • Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C. & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-Scale Research Study on Technology in K–12 Schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4) 489-507, Doi: 10.1080/15391523.2003.10782398
  • Bassett, G., Blake, J., Carberry, A., Gravander, J., Grimson, W., Krupczak, J. Jr., Mina, M. & Riley, D. (2014). Philosophical Perspectives on Engineering and Technological Literacy, I. Electrical and Computer Engineering Books. 1. http://lib.dr.xn--iastate-6he.edu/Ece_Books/1, Retrieved on September 28, 2017.
  • Bennett, J. (2000). National Educational Technology Standards: Raising the Bar By Degrees. Multimedia Schools, 7(3), 16-18.
  • Bitter, G. (1983). A Scope and Sequence Curriculum (K-12) for Computer Literacy. Presented at the Symposium on Computer Literacy, Baltimore, Maryland. (Erıc No. 235 792)
  • Bölükbaşı, F. (2012). Teknoloji Okuryazarlığına İlişkin İlköğretim Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri –Ankara İli Çankaya İlçesi Örneği-. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Britton, E., Long-Cotty, B. D. & Levenson, T. (2005). Bringing Technology Education into K-8 Classrooms: A Guide to Curricular Resources About the Designed World. Ca: Corwin Press. A Sage Publications Company.
  • Buglıarello, G. (2000). Reflections on Technological Literacy. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20(2), 83–89.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2000). Achieving Technological Literacy: A National İmperative. International Technology Education Association, Reston, Va.
  • Characteristics of a Technologically Literate Person. (2006). National Academies: National Academy of Engineering Web Site Technically Speaking. https://www.nae.edu/Nae/Techlithome.Nsf/Weblinks/Kgrg-%2055sq37?Opendocument, Retrieved on October 3, 2017,
  • Corbin,J. & Strauss,A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
  • Dakers, J. R. (2014). Technological Literacy as a Creative Process of Becoming Other. J. R. Dakers (Ed.), New Frontiers in Technological Literacy: Breaking with the Past (9-27). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan Publishing.
  • Davies, R. S. (2011). Understanding Technological Literacy: A Framework for Evaluating Educational Technology İntegration. Techtrends, 55(5), 45-52.
  • Executive Summary. (2003). Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development and Program Standards. International Technology Education Association, Reston, Va.
  • Garmire, E. & Pearson, G. (Ed.). (2006). Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy. Washington, Dc: National Academies Press.
  • Ginestie, J. (2005, April) Analysing Technology Education Through The Curricular Evolution and the İnvestigation Themes. International Conference Patt 15th, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Güneş, E. & Bahçivan, E. (2017). A Mixed Research-Based Model for Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Digital Literacy: Responses to ‘’Which Beliefs’’ and ‘’How and Why They İnteract’’ Questions. Computers & Education, 118(2018) 96-106.
  • Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of İnductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (1), 80–92.
  • Hasse, C. (2017). Technological Literacy for Teachers. Oxford Review of Education, 43 (3), 365-378, Doı: 10.1080/03054985.2017.1305057
  • Hayden, M. A. (1989). What is Technological Literacy?. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 9, 228-233.
  • Hills, C., Ryan, S., Smith, D.R., Warren-Forward, H., Levett-Jones, T. & Lapkin, S. (2016). Occupational Therapy Students’ Technological Skills: Are ‘Generation Y’ Ready for 21st Century Practice? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 63, 391–398, Doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12308.
  • Ingerman, A. & Collier- Reed, B. (2011). Analysis of Engineering Content within Technology Education. The Technology Teacher, 66 (8), 16-20.
  • International Society for Technology in Education. (1998). National Educational Technology Standards for Students [Electronic Version]. Https://Www.İste.Org/Docs/Pdfs/Nets_For_Students_1998_Standards.Pdf?Sfvrsn=2, Retrieved on October 7, 2017.
  • International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National Education Technology Standards for Students. Eugene. Or: Author.
  • International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (Iteea), (2017). Technology and Engineering Teacher. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (1996). Technology for All Americans: A Rationale and Structure for The Study of Technology. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (2004). Measuring Progress: Assessing Students for Technological Literacy. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (ITEA), (1985). Math, Science and Technology. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (ITEA/ITEEA) (2000/2002/2007). Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (2003). Advancing Exellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development and Program Standards. Reston, Va: Author.
  • Kahn, R. & Kellner, D. (2006). Reconstructing Technoliteracy: A Multiple Literacies Approach. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework (pp. 254–273). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kayaduman H., Sırakaya M. & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Eğitimde Fatih Projesinin Öğretmenlerin Yeterlik Durumları Açısından İncelenmesi. Xııı. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
  • Keirl, S. (2006). Ethical Technological Literacy as Democratic Curriculum Keystone. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework (pp. 81–102). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kıyıcı, M. (2008). Öğretmen Adaylarının Sayısal Okuryazarlık Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  • Knieová, V., Janovec, J., Kroufek R. & Chytrý V. (2016). Affective Dimension of Technological Literacy. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martínez And I. C. Torres (Ed.) 9th Annual İnternational Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 590-596). Iated Academy, Seville, Spain.
  • Leu, D. J. & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The Convergence of Literacy İnstruction with Networked Technologies for İnformation and Communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 108-127.
  • Lewis, T. (2000). Technology Education and Developing Countries. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 163–179.
  • Liddament, T. (1994).Technological Literacy: The Construction of Meaning. Design Studies, 15(2), 189–213.
  • Mcclellan Iıı, J. E. & Dorn, H. (2016). Dünya Tarihinde Bilim ve Teknoloji, M. Alev (Ed.) İçinde, Giriş (ss. 1-2). Ankara: Akılçelen Kitaplar.
  • Mcmillan, S. (1996). Literacy and Computer Literacy: Definitions and Comparisons. Computer & Education, 27 (3-4), 161-170.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2006). İlköğretim Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi (6,7 ve 8. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Ankara: Meb Yayınları.
  • National Research Council (2002). Investigating the Influence of Standarts: A Framework for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. In I. Weiss, M. Knapp, K. Hollweg & G. Burrill. (Ed.), Committee on Understanding the Influence of Standarts in K12 Sciece, Mathematics and Technology Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, Dc: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council Committee on Information Technological Literacy (1999). Being Fluent with Information Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. London: Sage Publication.
  • Petrina, S. (2003). The Educational Technology is Technology Education Manifesto. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 64-74.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital İmmigrants. Part 1. On The Horizon, 5, 1–6.
  • Rasinen, A. (2003). An Analysis of the Technology Education Curriculum of Six Countries. Journal of Technology Education. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/Ejournals/Jte/V15n1/Rasinen.Html, Retrieved on November 11, 2017.
  • Roblyer, M. D. (2000). The National Educational Technology Standards (Nets): A Review of Definitions, İmplications, and Strategies for Integrating Nets into K-12 Curriculum. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(2), 133-146.
  • Rose, L. & Dugger, W. (2002). What Americans Think About Technology. International Technology Education Association, Reston, Va.
  • Sanders, M. E. (1999). Technology Education in the Middle Level School: Its Role and Purpose. NASSP Bulletin, 83(608), 34–44.
  • Savage, E. & Sterry, L. (Ed.). (1990). A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education. Reston, Va: International Technology Education Association.
  • Shackelford, R. (2007). Technological Literacy: A New Basic for Inclusion in the University’s Core Curriculum. University College Cork, Ireland.
  • Smith, H. (1970). The Maryland Plan: The Junior High School Program in Industrial Arts. College Park, Md: Department of Industrial Education. (Erıc Document Reproduction Service No. Ed051403)
  • Şad, S. N. & Arıbaş, S. (2010). Bazı Gelişmiş Ülkelerde Teknoloji Eğitimi ve Türkiye İçin Öneriler. Milli Eğitim, 185, 278-299.
  • Waks, J. L. (2006). Rethinking Technological Literacy for The Global Network Era. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework (pp. 197-217). New York and England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wallace, J. & Hasse, C. (2014). Situating Technological Literacy in the Workplace. In Dakers, J. R. (Ed.), New Frontiers in Technological Literacy: Breaking with the Past (pp. 153-164). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan Publishing.
  • Williams, P. J. (2014). Technological Literacy and Digital Democracy: A Relationship Grounded in Technology Education. In Dakers, J. R. (Ed.), New Frontiers in Technological Literacy: Breaking with the Past (pp. 59-73). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan Publishing.
  • Wilson, V. & Harris, M. (2004). Creating Change? A Review of the Impact of Design and Technology in Schools in England. Journal Of Technology Education, 15(2), 46-65.
  • Wright, A. E. (1980). Developing Standards and Norms for Computer Literacy. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Education.

TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY: A HISTORICAL DESCRIPTION

Year 2018, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 107 - 126, 29.12.2018

Fatih Aydın , Yavuz Silik

Abstract



It is an incontrovertible fact
that human beings are too busy both in the past and today with technology. Particularly
in today's information age, the integration of technology with different fields
and innovations such as digital technologies that bring human beings into a
different world generate researchs, discussions and changes. The aim of this
study is to make a historical description by showing how technological literacy
emerged, what the definitions and changes in this subject are, what is
considered in the framework of the standards and related programs, and their
reflection in the world. In the study a qualitative research method has been
adopted, and in this context, the document analysis are reviewed. The
historical description shows that technological literacy has been defined in
different ways over the years by using various labels. It is clearly understood that standards are established, especially in the
context of education, and that they are integrated into educational programs in
a short period of time. Many
countries have focused on technological literacy, which is regarded as the most
important goal of technology education. As a result, it is clearly understood
that the understanding related with technological literacy in all this
presented process, is in continuous movement and change depending on
development of technology and its interaction with numerous elements (society,
culture, history, etc.). This result is a clear indication that we need to be
constantly updated about technological literacy.




Keywords

Technological literacy Standards on technological literacy Definition of technologically literate individuals Historical description

References

  • Ames, O. (1994). A Program for Technological Literacy in the Liberal Arts. Journal of College Science Teaching, March/April, 286–288.
  • Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C. & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-Scale Research Study on Technology in K–12 Schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4) 489-507, Doi: 10.1080/15391523.2003.10782398
  • Bassett, G., Blake, J., Carberry, A., Gravander, J., Grimson, W., Krupczak, J. Jr., Mina, M. & Riley, D. (2014). Philosophical Perspectives on Engineering and Technological Literacy, I. Electrical and Computer Engineering Books. 1. http://lib.dr.xn--iastate-6he.edu/Ece_Books/1, Retrieved on September 28, 2017.
  • Bennett, J. (2000). National Educational Technology Standards: Raising the Bar By Degrees. Multimedia Schools, 7(3), 16-18.
  • Bitter, G. (1983). A Scope and Sequence Curriculum (K-12) for Computer Literacy. Presented at the Symposium on Computer Literacy, Baltimore, Maryland. (Erıc No. 235 792)
  • Bölükbaşı, F. (2012). Teknoloji Okuryazarlığına İlişkin İlköğretim Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri –Ankara İli Çankaya İlçesi Örneği-. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Britton, E., Long-Cotty, B. D. & Levenson, T. (2005). Bringing Technology Education into K-8 Classrooms: A Guide to Curricular Resources About the Designed World. Ca: Corwin Press. A Sage Publications Company.
  • Buglıarello, G. (2000). Reflections on Technological Literacy. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20(2), 83–89.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2000). Achieving Technological Literacy: A National İmperative. International Technology Education Association, Reston, Va.
  • Characteristics of a Technologically Literate Person. (2006). National Academies: National Academy of Engineering Web Site Technically Speaking. https://www.nae.edu/Nae/Techlithome.Nsf/Weblinks/Kgrg-%2055sq37?Opendocument, Retrieved on October 3, 2017,
  • Corbin,J. & Strauss,A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
  • Dakers, J. R. (2014). Technological Literacy as a Creative Process of Becoming Other. J. R. Dakers (Ed.), New Frontiers in Technological Literacy: Breaking with the Past (9-27). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan Publishing.
  • Davies, R. S. (2011). Understanding Technological Literacy: A Framework for Evaluating Educational Technology İntegration. Techtrends, 55(5), 45-52.
  • Executive Summary. (2003). Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development and Program Standards. International Technology Education Association, Reston, Va.
  • Garmire, E. & Pearson, G. (Ed.). (2006). Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy. Washington, Dc: National Academies Press.
  • Ginestie, J. (2005, April) Analysing Technology Education Through The Curricular Evolution and the İnvestigation Themes. International Conference Patt 15th, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Güneş, E. & Bahçivan, E. (2017). A Mixed Research-Based Model for Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Digital Literacy: Responses to ‘’Which Beliefs’’ and ‘’How and Why They İnteract’’ Questions. Computers & Education, 118(2018) 96-106.
  • Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of İnductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (1), 80–92.
  • Hasse, C. (2017). Technological Literacy for Teachers. Oxford Review of Education, 43 (3), 365-378, Doı: 10.1080/03054985.2017.1305057
  • Hayden, M. A. (1989). What is Technological Literacy?. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 9, 228-233.
  • Hills, C., Ryan, S., Smith, D.R., Warren-Forward, H., Levett-Jones, T. & Lapkin, S. (2016). Occupational Therapy Students’ Technological Skills: Are ‘Generation Y’ Ready for 21st Century Practice? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 63, 391–398, Doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12308.
  • Ingerman, A. & Collier- Reed, B. (2011). Analysis of Engineering Content within Technology Education. The Technology Teacher, 66 (8), 16-20.
  • International Society for Technology in Education. (1998). National Educational Technology Standards for Students [Electronic Version]. Https://Www.İste.Org/Docs/Pdfs/Nets_For_Students_1998_Standards.Pdf?Sfvrsn=2, Retrieved on October 7, 2017.
  • International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National Education Technology Standards for Students. Eugene. Or: Author.
  • International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (Iteea), (2017). Technology and Engineering Teacher. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (1996). Technology for All Americans: A Rationale and Structure for The Study of Technology. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (2004). Measuring Progress: Assessing Students for Technological Literacy. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (ITEA), (1985). Math, Science and Technology. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (ITEA/ITEEA) (2000/2002/2007). Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, Va: Author.
  • International Technology Education Association (2003). Advancing Exellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development and Program Standards. Reston, Va: Author.
  • Kahn, R. & Kellner, D. (2006). Reconstructing Technoliteracy: A Multiple Literacies Approach. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework (pp. 254–273). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kayaduman H., Sırakaya M. & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Eğitimde Fatih Projesinin Öğretmenlerin Yeterlik Durumları Açısından İncelenmesi. Xııı. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
  • Keirl, S. (2006). Ethical Technological Literacy as Democratic Curriculum Keystone. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework (pp. 81–102). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kıyıcı, M. (2008). Öğretmen Adaylarının Sayısal Okuryazarlık Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  • Knieová, V., Janovec, J., Kroufek R. & Chytrý V. (2016). Affective Dimension of Technological Literacy. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martínez And I. C. Torres (Ed.) 9th Annual İnternational Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 590-596). Iated Academy, Seville, Spain.
  • Leu, D. J. & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The Convergence of Literacy İnstruction with Networked Technologies for İnformation and Communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 108-127.
  • Lewis, T. (2000). Technology Education and Developing Countries. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 163–179.
  • Liddament, T. (1994).Technological Literacy: The Construction of Meaning. Design Studies, 15(2), 189–213.
  • Mcclellan Iıı, J. E. & Dorn, H. (2016). Dünya Tarihinde Bilim ve Teknoloji, M. Alev (Ed.) İçinde, Giriş (ss. 1-2). Ankara: Akılçelen Kitaplar.
  • Mcmillan, S. (1996). Literacy and Computer Literacy: Definitions and Comparisons. Computer & Education, 27 (3-4), 161-170.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2006). İlköğretim Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi (6,7 ve 8. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Ankara: Meb Yayınları.
  • National Research Council (2002). Investigating the Influence of Standarts: A Framework for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. In I. Weiss, M. Knapp, K. Hollweg & G. Burrill. (Ed.), Committee on Understanding the Influence of Standarts in K12 Sciece, Mathematics and Technology Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, Dc: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council Committee on Information Technological Literacy (1999). Being Fluent with Information Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. London: Sage Publication.
  • Petrina, S. (2003). The Educational Technology is Technology Education Manifesto. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 64-74.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital İmmigrants. Part 1. On The Horizon, 5, 1–6.
  • Rasinen, A. (2003). An Analysis of the Technology Education Curriculum of Six Countries. Journal of Technology Education. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/Ejournals/Jte/V15n1/Rasinen.Html, Retrieved on November 11, 2017.
  • Roblyer, M. D. (2000). The National Educational Technology Standards (Nets): A Review of Definitions, İmplications, and Strategies for Integrating Nets into K-12 Curriculum. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(2), 133-146.
  • Rose, L. & Dugger, W. (2002). What Americans Think About Technology. International Technology Education Association, Reston, Va.
  • Sanders, M. E. (1999). Technology Education in the Middle Level School: Its Role and Purpose. NASSP Bulletin, 83(608), 34–44.
  • Savage, E. & Sterry, L. (Ed.). (1990). A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education. Reston, Va: International Technology Education Association.
  • Shackelford, R. (2007). Technological Literacy: A New Basic for Inclusion in the University’s Core Curriculum. University College Cork, Ireland.
  • Smith, H. (1970). The Maryland Plan: The Junior High School Program in Industrial Arts. College Park, Md: Department of Industrial Education. (Erıc Document Reproduction Service No. Ed051403)
  • Şad, S. N. & Arıbaş, S. (2010). Bazı Gelişmiş Ülkelerde Teknoloji Eğitimi ve Türkiye İçin Öneriler. Milli Eğitim, 185, 278-299.
  • Waks, J. L. (2006). Rethinking Technological Literacy for The Global Network Era. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework (pp. 197-217). New York and England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wallace, J. & Hasse, C. (2014). Situating Technological Literacy in the Workplace. In Dakers, J. R. (Ed.), New Frontiers in Technological Literacy: Breaking with the Past (pp. 153-164). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan Publishing.
  • Williams, P. J. (2014). Technological Literacy and Digital Democracy: A Relationship Grounded in Technology Education. In Dakers, J. R. (Ed.), New Frontiers in Technological Literacy: Breaking with the Past (pp. 59-73). New York, Ny: Palgrave Macmillan Publishing.
  • Wilson, V. & Harris, M. (2004). Creating Change? A Review of the Impact of Design and Technology in Schools in England. Journal Of Technology Education, 15(2), 46-65.
  • Wright, A. E. (1980). Developing Standards and Norms for Computer Literacy. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Education.
There are 59 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Fatih Aydın 0000-0003-0453-5734

Yavuz Silik 0000-0002-6346-1248

Publication Date December 29, 2018
Submission Date June 26, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 3 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Aydın, F., & Silik, Y. (2018). TEKNOLOJİ OKURYAZARLIĞI: TARİHSEL BİR BETİMLEME. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 107-126.
 Download Cover Image

Dear Colleagues,
We are very pleased to announce that the latest issue of IHEAD (Vol. 10- Iss. 1) has been released. We kindly want to express our speacial thanks to the editorial board members, reviewers, and authors for their invaluable contribution to this issue. Also, we are delighted to announce that the next issue (Vol. 10- Iss. 2) of the IHEAD will be available online in December, 2025. As of January, 2024, IHEAD has been accepting submissions in English along with Turkish. Handling your papers within the scope education for the next issue will be a great pleasure for us. Many thanks in advance for your contributions.
Editorial Board

Ihlara Journal of Educational Research (IHEAD) by Education Faculty of Aksaray University is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license,visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/  

by-nc-sa.svg

Ihlara Journal Educational Research (IHEAD) uses iThenticate, one the most trusted plagiarism checkers by the world’s top researchers, publishers, and scholars.

ithenticate-badge-rec-reverse.jpg

Ihlara Journal Educational Research (IHEAD) is an open-access journal.

Open-Access-logo.png