Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Gülşah Koçak; Zeynep Kurtulmuş

doi:10.47479/ihead.1822765

TR EN

Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Yapay zekâ iş, eğitim, sağlık gibi geniş yelpazede hızla gündelik yaşamımızda yer edinirken, çocukların kullanımıyla ebeveynlerin rolleri genişlemekte ve dijital dünyada çocuklarını bilinçli ve güvenli yönlendirme sorumlulukları her geçen gün daha da önemli hale gelmektedir. Ebeveynlerin yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı ve dijital ebeveynlik farkındalığı arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen bu çalışma, nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel tarama modeli ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın örneklemini, Ankara il merkezinde yaşayan ve 1–6 yaş aralığında çocuğu bulunan 200 ebeveyn oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama araçları; Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği ve Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalık Ölçeğidir. Veri analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, bağımsız gruplar t-testi, ANOVA ve Pearson korelasyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre ebeveynlerin yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı ile dijital ebeveynlik farkındalık boyutları arasında anlamlı ilişkiler saptanmıştır. Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı puanları arttıkça, dijital ebeveynlik farkındalığının verimli kullanım ve risklerden koruma boyutlarında artış, olumsuz model ve dijital ihmal boyutlarında ise azalma görülmüştür. Yapay zekâ teknolojilerini günlük yaşamda kullanan ve bu konuda eğitim almış ebeveynlerin yapay zekâ okuryazarlık düzeyleri ve dijital ebeveynlik farkındalıkları yüksek bulunmuştur. Gelir ve çalışma durumuna göre anlamlı bir farklılık gözlenmezken, erkek çocuğa sahip ebeveynlerin dijital ihmal puanları daha yüksek çıkmıştır. Sonuçlar, ebeveynlerin yapay zekâ okuryazarlığının, dijital ebeveynlik davranışlarını olumlu yönde şekillendiren bir değişken olduğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

Examining the Relationship Between Parents' ArtificiaI Intelligence Literacy Levels and Digital Parenting Awareness

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being integrated into daily life across domains such as work, education, and healthcare. As children’s engagement with AI expands, parental roles broaden accordingly, and the responsibility to guide children safely and consciously in the digital world has become increasingly important. This study examined the relationship between parents’ AI literacy and digital parenting awareness using a correlational survey design. The sample consisted of 200 parents of children aged 1–6 years residing in central Ankara, Türkiye. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale and the Digital Parenting Awareness Scale. Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analyses were conducted. The findings revealed significant relationships between parents’ AI literacy and the subdimensions of digital parenting awareness. As AI literacy scores increased, scores on the efficient use and protection from risks subdimensions also increased, while scores on negative modelling and digital neglect decreased. Parents who used AI technologies in their daily lives and had received training in this area demonstrated higher AI literacy and digital parenting awareness. No significant differences were found by income or employment status; however, parents of boys reported significantly higher digital neglect scores than parents of girls. The results indicate that parents’ AI literacy is a key variable positively shaping digital parenting behaviours.

Keywords

References

Anderson, J. (2024, Ekim 2). The impact of AI on children's development (No. 446) [Audio podcast episode]. In The Harvard EdCast. Harvard Graduate School of Education. https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/edcast/24/10/impact-ai-childrens-development
Ashraf, M. (2024). A systematic review on the potential of AI and ChatGPT for parental support and child well-being. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.09492
Bajwa, R. S., Yunus, A., Saeed, H., & Zulfqar, A. (2024). Parenting in the age of artificial intelligence: Digital guardians. In Z. Zaremohzzabieh, R. Abdullah, & S. Ahrari (Eds.), Exploring youth studies in the age of AI (pp. 44–66). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3350-1.ch003
Baker, S., Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M. T., & Morawska, A. (2017). A randomized controlled trial evaluating a low-intensity interactive online parenting intervention, Triple P Online Brief, with parents of children with early onset conduct problems. Behaviour research and therapy, 91, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.01.016
Barr, R. (2019). Parenting in the digital age. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 380–409). Routledge.
Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0021
Bayzan, Ş., Yıldırım, Ö., Karakuş, T., Kurşun, E., Turgut, Y. E., & Aslan, A. (2023). Türkiye’deki Ebeveynlerin İnternet Kullanım Alışkanlıkları ve Dijital Okuryazarlık Becerileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Korkut Ata Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Özel Sayı 1 (Cumhuriyetin 100. Yılına), 1249-1271. https://doi.org/10.51531/korkutataturkiyat.1361402
Burgsteiner, H., Kandlhofer, M., & Steinbauer, G. (2016). IRobot: Teaching the Basics of Artificial Intelligence in High Schools. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9864

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2024). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Chen, J. J., & Lin, J. C. (2024). Artificial intelligence as a double-edged sword: Wielding the POWER principles to maximize its positive effects and minimize its negative effects. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 25(1), 146-153.
Choudhary, V., Marchetti, A., Shrestha, Y. R., & Puranam, P. (2025). Human-AI ensembles: When can they work? Journal of Management, 51(2), 536–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231194968
Croeser, S., & Eckersley, P. (2019). Theories of parenting and their application to artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES '19) (pp. 423–428). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314231
Çelebi, C., Yılmaz, F., Demir, U., & Karakuş, F. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Literacy: An Adaptation Study. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 4(2), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1401740
Deckker, D., & Sumanasekara, S. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in education: Transforming learning and teaching. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD), 10(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra20429
DRONE Project. (2025, 18 Mart). Parents' perspectives on digital literacy, AI, and crisis preparedness: Insights from the DRONE Project. https://mydroneproject.eu/2025/03/18/parents-perspectives-on-digital-literacy-ai-and-crisis-preparedness-insights-from-the-drone-project/
Druga, S., Christoph, F. L., & Ko, A. J. (2022). Family as a third space for AI literacies: How do children and parents learn about AI together? In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–17). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502031
Durak, A. (2019). Ebeveyn arabuluculuğunun bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, Bartın Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü]. https://acikerisim.bartin.edu.tr/handle/11772/1882
Dzakiah, D. (2024). Students' perspectives on AI-assisted tools in learning narrative writing: A study on Indonesian Islamic higher education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic and Interdisciplinary Studies (Vol. 3, pp. 544–551).
Eira, M., Rasouli, A., & Charisi, V. (2025). Parents' perceptions about the use of generative AI systems by adolescents. In Proceedings of the 24th Interaction Design and Children Conference (pp. 927–931). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3713043.3731508
Entenberg, G. A., Mizrahi, S., Walker, H., Aghakhani, S., Mostovoy, K., Carre, N., Marshall, Z., Dosovitsky, G., Benfica, D., Rousseau, A., Lin, G., & Bunge, E. L. (2023). AI-based chatbot micro-intervention for parents: Meaningful engagement, learning, and efficacy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, Article 1080770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1080770
Garnier, M., Cussac, M., Delaune, C., Espy, C., & Papon-Vidal, L. (2024). The pivotal role of libraries in sustainable AI development. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science / La Revue canadienne des sciences de l'information et de bibliothéconomie, 47(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v47i2.17699
Gedik, Ç., & Şahan, G. (2024). Evaluation of parents’ and teachers’ views on digital parenting skills. International E-Journal of Educational Studies, 8(16), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1417362
Glassman, J., Humphreys, K., Yeung, S., Smith, M., Jauregui, A., Milstein, A., & Sanders, L. (2021). Parents’ perspectives on using artificial intelligence to reduce technology interference during early childhood: Cross-sectional online survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e19461. https://doi.org/10.2196/19461
Gözüm, A. İ. C., & Kandır, A. (2021). Digital games pre-schoolers play: parental mediation and examination of educational content. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3293-3326.
Haugeland, J., Craver, C. F., & Klein, C. (Eds.). (2023). Mind design III: Philosophy, psychology, and artificial intelligence. MIT Press.
Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76–83. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5168/
Kalkim, A., Konal Korkmaz, E., & Uysal Toraman, A. (2024). Examining the relationship between digital parenting self-efficacy and digital parenting awareness of early adolescents' parents. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 78, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.05.028
Kandlhofer, M., Weixelbraun, P., Menzinger, M., Steinbauer-Wagner, G., & Kemenesi, Á. (2023). Education and awareness for artificial intelligence. In A. Berglund, M. Bottino, B. Holmboe, E. H. Iversen, J. Malyn-Smith, & G. Vahrenhold (Eds.), Informatics in schools. Beyond bits and bytes: Nurturing informatics intelligence in education (pp. 3–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44900-0_1
Karaboğa, M. T. (2019). Dijital medya okuryazarlığında anne ve baba eğitimi. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(20), 2040–2073. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.601942
Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar–ilkeler–teknikler. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Kinnula, M., Iivari, N., Kotilainen, S., Okkonen, J., & Sharma, S. (2020). Researchers' toolbox for the future: Designing the future of technology with and for children. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference: Extended Abstracts (pp. 62–68). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397617.3398064
Kline, R. B. (2013). Assessing statistical aspects of test fairness with structural equation modelling. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(2–3), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.767624
Kurudayıoğlu/, Y. D. D. M., & Tüzel, A. G. M. S. (2010). 21. Yüzyıl Okuryazarlık Türleri, Değişen Metin Algısı ve Türkçe Eğitimi. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, 28, 0-298. https://izlik.org/JA58YP37EJ
Lafton, T., Wilhelmsen, J. E. B., & Holmarsdottir, H. B. (2024). Parental mediation and children’s digital well-being in family life in Norway. Journal of Children and Media, 18(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2023.2299956
Li, J., Liu, S., Zheng, J., & He, F. (2024). Enhancing visual communication design education: Integrating AI in collaborative teaching strategies. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 24(4–5), 2469–2483. https://doi.org/10.3233/JCM-247471
Li, S., & Gu, X. (2023). A risk framework for human-centered artificial intelligence in education: Based on literature review and Delphi-AHP method. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 187–202.
Lin, C., Šabanović, S., Dombrowski, L., Miller, A. D., Brady, E., & MacDorman, K. F. (2021). Parental acceptance of children's storytelling robots: A projection of the uncanny valley of AI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, Article 579993. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.579993
Lin, P., Van Brummelen, J., Lukin, G., Williams, R., & Breazeal, C. (2020). Zhorai: Designing a conversational agent for children to explore machine learning concepts. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(9), 13381–13388. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7061
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Manap, A., & Durmuş, E. (2020). Dijital ebeveynlik farkındalık ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 978–993. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.711101
Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2023). Eğitimde dijital dönüşüm ve yapay zekâ stratejisi.
Modecki, K. L., Goldberg, R. E., Wisniewski, P., & Orben, A. (2022). What is digital parenting? A systematic review of past measurement and blueprint for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(6), 1673–1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211072458
Neumann, M. M. (2018). Parent scaffolding of young children's use of touch screen tablets. Early Child Development and Care, 188(12), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1278215
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Olds, D. (2007). Improving preschool for low-income children with programmatic randomized controlled trials. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(8), 807–809. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.8.807
Pakdemirli, A. (2026). Artificial intelligence and digital technologies in family and parenting contexts. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, 10(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1868255
Pallant, J. (2017). SPSS kullanma kılavuzu: SPSS ile adım adım veri analizi (S. Balcı & B. Ahi, Çev.). Anı Yayıncılık.
Prokupek, L., Hummel, T., Blaurock, S., Cohen, F. & Anders, Y. (2026). Potential of a digital parenting app to support parents of toddlers: Relations between the intensity of app use, language-related parental self-efficacy and the home literacy environment. British Educational Research Journal, 52, 643–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70022
Rainie, L., & Anderson, J. (2024, Şubat 29). Experts imagine the impact of artificial intelligence by 2040. Imagining the Digital Future Center. https://imaginingthedigitalfuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/AI2040-FINAL-White-Paper-2-2.29.24.pdf
Robinson, S. C. (2020). Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI). Technology in Society, 63, 101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101421
Rode, J. A. (2009). Digital parenting: Designing children's safety. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (pp. 244–251). British Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2009.29
Ruiz, P., Mills, K., Lee, K., Coenraad, M., Fusco, J., Roschelle, J., & Weisgrau, J. (2024). AI literacy: A framework to understand, evaluate, and use emerging technology. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/218
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2004). Exploring the role of children's role in adults' adoption and use of computers. Information Technology & People, 17(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840410522170
Shao, T., Zhu, C., Lei, H., Jiang, Y., Wang, H., & Zhang, C. (2024). The relationship of parent-child technoference and child problematic smartphone use: The roles of parent-child relationship, negative parenting styles, and children's gender. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 17, 2067–2081. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S456411
Siyahhan, S., Barab, S. A., & Downton, M. P. (2010). Using activity theory to understand intergenerational play: The case of Family Quest. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9097-1
Smahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo
Soyoof, A., Reynolds, B. L., Neumann, M., Scull, J., Tour, E., & McLay, K. (2024). The impact of parent mediation on young children's home digital literacy practices and learning: A narrative review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12866
Steinbauer, G., Kandlhofer, M., Chklovski, T., Heintz, F., & Koenig, S. (2021). A differentiated discussion about AI education K–12. KI – Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00724-8
Stolpe, K., & Hallström, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159
Stormshak, E., Connell, A., Mauricio, A. M., McLaughlin, M., & Caruthers, A. (2025). Digital health delivery of parenting skills to improve conduct problems in middle school youth across two distinct randomized trials. Prevention Science, 26(4), 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-024-01750-2
Supriyadi, S., & Maesyaroh, S. (2023). The effect of parenting patterns and digital literacy on social-emotional development in early children. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(1b), 859–867. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i1b.1202
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson. Turan, T., Turan, G., & Küçüksille, E. (2022). Yapay zekâ etiği: Toplum üzerine etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(2), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.1058538
UNICEF Innocenti – Global Office of Research and Foresight. (2025). Guidance on AI and children: Recommendations for AI policies and systems that uphold child rights (Version 3.0). UNICEF Innocenti – Global Office of Research and Foresight. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/media/11991/file/UNICEF-Innocenti-Guidance-on-AI-and-Children-3-2025.pdf
Üstündağ Alkan, R., Aslan, A., Turgut, Y. E., & Kurşun, E. (2021). Factors affecting parental mediation strategies in children's technology use: A systematic review. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(18), 702–723. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.925859
Vasoya, N. H. (2023). The role of parents and educators in managing the risks of artificial intelligence. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 41(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v41i4899
Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
Wood, E., Petkovski, M., De Pasquale, D., Gottardo, A., Evans, M. A., & Savage, R. S. (2016). Parent scaffolding of young children when engaged with mobile technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 690. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00690
Xiao, J., Luo, J., Ly-Mapes, O., Wu, T. T., Dye, T., Al Jallad, N., Hao, P., Ruan, J., Bullock, S., & Fiscella, K. (2021). Assessing a smartphone app (AICaries) that uses artificial intelligence to detect dental caries in children and provides interactive oral health education: Protocol for a design and usability testing study. JMIR Research Protocols, 10(10), e32921. https://doi.org/10.2196/32921
Yaman, F., Dönmez, O., Akbulut, Y., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., Çoklar, A., & Guyer, T. (2019). Exploration of parents' digital parenting efficacy through several demographic variables. Education and Science, 44(199), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7897
Yıldız, İ., & Kanak, M. (2021). Çocukların Dijital Teknoloji Kullanımı ve Ebeveyn Yaklaşımları: Kesitsel Bir Çalışma. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 15(2), 306-314. https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.797346
Yu, J., Bai, C., & Roque, R. (2020). Considering parents in coding kit design: Understanding parents' perspectives and roles. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376130
Yunike, Y., Rehana, R., Misinem, M., & Kusumawaty, I. (2023). The implications of utilizing artificial intelligence-based parenting technology on children's mental health: A literature review. Poltekita: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 17(3), 1083–1089. https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v17i3.2958

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Specialist Studies in Education (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Gülşah Koçak ^*
0000-0003-3890-5422
Türkiye

Zeynep Kurtulmuş
0000-0002-8799-8306
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 25, 2026

Submission Date

November 12, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 13, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 11 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1822765

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA28AA92CT

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Koçak, G., & Kurtulmuş, Z. (2026). Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 86-104. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1822765

AMA

1.Koçak G, Kurtulmuş Z. Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. IHEAD. 2026;11(1):86-104. doi:10.47479/ihead.1822765

Chicago

Koçak, Gülşah, and Zeynep Kurtulmuş. 2026. “Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri Ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi”. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 11 (1): 86-104. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1822765.

EndNote

Koçak G, Kurtulmuş Z (June 1, 2026) Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 11 1 86–104.

IEEE

[1]G. Koçak and Z. Kurtulmuş, “Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi”, IHEAD, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 86–104, June 2026, doi: 10.47479/ihead.1822765.

ISNAD

Koçak, Gülşah - Kurtulmuş, Zeynep. “Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri Ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi”. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 11/1 (June 1, 2026): 86-104. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1822765.

JAMA

1.Koçak G, Kurtulmuş Z. Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. IHEAD. 2026;11:86–104.

MLA

Koçak, Gülşah, and Zeynep Kurtulmuş. “Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri Ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi”. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 11, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 86-104, doi:10.47479/ihead.1822765.

Vancouver

1.Gülşah Koçak, Zeynep Kurtulmuş. Ebeveynlerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Dijital Ebeveynlik Farkındalıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. IHEAD. 2026 Jun. 1;11(1):86-104. doi:10.47479/ihead.1822765