Review

A THEORETICAL REFLECTION ON PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT IN ORGANIZATIONS

Volume: 1 Number: 2 December 30, 2016
EN TR

A THEORETICAL REFLECTION ON PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT IN ORGANIZATIONS

Abstract

The aim of this study is to define the concept of psychological contract that emerges and develops in almost every employee-organization relations and  to make an analysis by associating it with the research findings within the context of background, effects and results. For this purpose theoretical foundations, characteristics, violations and outcomes of psychological contract evaluated on the theoretical basis. Based on this analysis it was concluded that the workplace environment is far more comprehensive, complex and difficult to understand. Therefore the discourse regarding psychological contract should be critically reconsidered in the light of workplace reality.

Keywords

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding Organizational Behavior, Homewood IL: DorseyPress.
  2. Armstrong, M. ve Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. London: KoganPage.
  3. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an Understanding of Inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
  4. Arslan, B. ve Ulaş, D. (2004). İstihdamın Korunması ve İşten Çıkarılanlara Uygulanan Yardımlar. Ege Akademik Bakış, 4, 1-2.
  5. Aselage, J., Eisenberger, R. (2003). “PerceivedOrganizationalSupportandPsychological Contracts, s. A Theoretical Integration”, Journal of OrganizationalBehavior, 24, 491–509.
  6. Atkinson, P.H., Barrow, C. and Connors, L. (2003). Models of police probationer career progression: preconceptions of the psychological contract. Human Resource Development International, 6, 43–57.
  7. Aykanat, Z. (2014). Psikolojik Sözleşmenin İhlali Algısında Örgütsel Adaletin Etkisi ve Etik Liderin Aracı Değişken Olarak Rolü: Kalkınma Ajanslarında Uygulama. (Doktora Tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
  8. Aydın K, G. (2009) “Third Party Roles in Mediating or Preverting Psychological Contract Violations in High-Context Cultures”,The Business Review, Canbridge, Summer, 12(1).

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Studies on Education

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Hakan Topaloğlu
ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIV
Türkiye

Gökhan Arastaman
HACETTEPE UNIV
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 30, 2016

Submission Date

February 18, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 1 Number: 2

APA
Topaloğlu, H., & Arastaman, G. (2016). ÖRGÜTLERDE PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞME ÜZERİNE KURAMSAL BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 25-36. https://izlik.org/JA99GY99YU

Dear Colleagues,
We are very pleased to announce that the latest issue of IHEAD (Vol. 10- Iss. 2) has been released. We kindly want to express our speacial thanks to the editorial board members, reviewers, and authors for their invaluable contribution to this issue. Also, we are delighted to announce that the next issue (Vol. 11- Iss. 1) of the IHEAD will be available online in June, 2026. As of January, 2024, IHEAD has been accepting submissions in English along with Turkish. Handling your papers within the scope education for the next issue will be a great pleasure for us. Many thanks in advance for your contributions.
Editorial Board

Ihlara Journal of Educational Research (IHEAD) by Education Faculty of Aksaray University is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license,visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/  

by-nc-sa.svg

Ihlara Journal Educational Research (IHEAD) uses iThenticate, one the most trusted plagiarism checkers by the world’s top researchers, publishers, and scholars.

ithenticate-badge-rec-reverse.jpg

Ihlara Journal Educational Research (IHEAD) is an open-access journal.

Open-Access-logo.png